Did Chariots of Iron Defeat the Word of God?

Did Chariots of Iron Defeat the Word of God?

Picture


“… the mountain country shall be yours. Although it is wooded, you shall cut it down, and its farthest extent shall be yours; for you shall drive out the Canaanites, though they have iron chariots and are strong
​(Joshua 17:18 NKJV).

So the Lord was with Judah. And they drove out the mountaineers, but they could not drive out the inhabitants of the lowland, because they had chariots of iron” (Judges 1:19 NKJV).

When we compare Joshua 17:18 and Judges 1:19 it might appear that – despite God’s promise of victory over the iron chariots of the Canaanites – the Israelites were unable to defeat this enemy and their formidable war chariots. But there are several possible explanations for this apparent contradiction of God’s promise.

First, we should carefully consider the actual wording of God’s promise.  In Joshua 17:18 the Israelites were told that the mountain country to its “farthest extent” would be given to them.  This does not specifically say that the Israelites would be helped against the Canaanites beyond the mountain region.  When we turn to Judges 1:19, we find that Israel could not drive out the Canaanites with their iron-armored chariots from the lowlands. In other words, the region in question was not the mountainous region of the Promised Land, but the flat coastal plain.

Another reason why there may be no conflict between the two verses is that Judges 1:19 was written some time after Joshua 17:18. God’s promise to drive out the Canaanites may have been fulfilled, but it clearly was not a promise in perpetuity.  We know that Canaanites were able to move back into the land as time went on, after Israel had taken control of the area.  So Judges 1 may refer to Israel’s failure to establish lasting control of the lowland areas.

We should always remember the principle of conditionality behind the type of promise made in Joshua 17:18.  God promised the Israelites that he would assist them and be with them in battle as long as they obeyed him, but he also made it clear that he would withdraw his help if they turned from him.  In fact, we find a specific reference to the failure of the Israelites to drive out the Canaanites from some areas in exactly this context in the Book of Judges:

“… I brought you up out of Egypt and led you into the land I swore to give to your ancestors. I said, ‘I will never break my covenant with you, and you shall not make a covenant with the people of this land, but you shall break down their altars.’ Yet you have disobeyed me. Why have you done this? And I have also said, ‘I will not drive them out before you; they will become traps for you, and their gods will become snares to you’” (Judges 2:1-3 NIV, emphasis added).

So, despite the original promise given to Israel in Joshua 17:18, we see that God rescinded his promise when Israel did not obey him.  This is a principle we find repeatedly throughout the Old Testament, and it is provides a lesson for us today. We cannot claim the blessings God promises in his word if we are not willing to live according to that word.


Calculating Our Blessings

Calculating Our Blessings

Picture

“Surely you have granted … unending blessings …” (Psalm 21:6).
 

Normally, we speak of “counting our blessings” in terms of considering all the good things with which we have been blessed. But for many of us privileged to live in areas where those good things are abundant, “calculating our blessings” with the help of an adding machine or calculator may be more appropriate!

In fact, perhaps the analogy is one that holds true for all of us – even those who are less fortunate. This is because when it comes to looking at the blessings we have been given, it is very human for us to look around at what we have in the here and now. Yet when we look back and consider the blessings we have enjoyed over time, for so many of us the numbers begin to require calculating help.

Our perspective begins to change when we realize that many of the things we may take for granted are only occasionally enjoyed by millions. Think, for example, of the statistic that if we can afford to eat three meals a day for three weeks in a row we are among the top 15% of the richest people in the world.  Even if they are not starving, we should realize that the majority of people in this world do not get food all the time.  But if we take our three meals a day, getting out a calculator and multiplying that number by the number of days in our lives might help us better realize the number of blessings in our lives – in that one area alone. 

But the same truth applies in so many areas. The doctor’s and dentist’s visits we may grumble about having to fit into our schedules seem different when we realize the very occasional access so many have to medical or dental care – if they have it at all.   If we have a steady job, the number of days for which we get paid adds up quickly compared to those without or unable to work – time for the calculator again. And what about the gift of life itself? The resting human heart beats some 60-80 times per minute. If we try to multiply that rate by a day, a year, or our lifetime so far, we definitely need that calculator. 

And so we could go on. But the point of what we are talking about here is obvious enough. For those of us in the United States who wish to celebrate Thanksgiving Day  with  a genuine spirit of thankfulness, we should remember to look further than only at the blessings that surround us on the Thanksgiving table. It’s easy to look around in times of economic downturn or other problems and feel less thankful because we only see the things we have now when we should perhaps try to look more at the blessings we have been given all the way to this point, and the many more that we trust lie ahead.

Perhaps it would be good, as we take stock of what God has given us on the Day of Thanksgiving, to do a little math regarding any one of the ongoing blessings we enjoy. We don’t really need to get out a calculator to try to add up the huge numbers of blessings we all have received, but then again, we could put a calculator on the table this Thanksgiving meal – just to remind ourselves that if we tried to add up all those blessings, we would need it. 


Why the Samaritans Were Shunned

Why the Samaritans Were Shunned

The region of Samaria that is frequently mentioned in the New Testament has a colorful history that helps us understand many things written in the four Gospels. 

samaria was the area between Judea and Galilee that had been the northern kingdom of Israel after Judah and Israel split into two monarchies following the death of Solomon around 931 BC.  Some two hundred years later, in 726–722 BC, the Assyrian king Shalmaneser V invaded the region, captured the capital city of Samaria and deported many of its inhabitants to Assyrian cities in Mesopotamia.  But some of the Samaritans remained in their land and eventually mixed with other groups who moved into the area.

This mixed – partly Jewish and partly pagan – population represented the Samaritans of Jesus’ day.  Although they worshiped the same God as the Jews and strictly upheld the commands of the Mosaic law, their religion was rejected by Judaism – both because of their partly Gentile ancestry, and because the Samaritans accepted only the first five books of the Bible and worshipped in their temple on Mount Gerazim in Samaria rather than in the Temple in Jerusalem.
 
As a result, the Samaritans were despised by most Jews – who treated their northerly neighbors terribly, as virtual “untouchables.”  The depths of this terrible disdain can be seen in the fact that Samaritans could not even be accepted as converts to Judaism. Rather than “contaminate” themselves by passing through Samaritan territory, Jews who travelled between Judea and Galilee would often cross over the River Jordan in order to bypass Samaria, rather than going through the area. Those who did take the direct route would hurry so as not to stay overnight there and would even refuse to eat in that area.  

The attitude is reflected in later statements in the Jewish Talmud such as: “He that eats the bread of the Samaritans is like to one that eats the flesh of swine” (Mishnah Shebiith 8.10).  Perhaps understandably, the Samaritans developed a deep antipathy toward the Jews, and there is no question that there was a great deal of mutual hostility and religious rejection between the two cultures (Luke 9:52-53).

This was the situation in the society into which Jesus was born.  When we understand this background, we see how remarkable Jesus’ teaching and actions regarding the Samaritans truly were.  We can sense the shock among many of his Jewish listeners when Christ told the parable of the “Good Samaritan,” an individual he held up as being not only “our neighbor,” but also someone more righteous than a representative priest and Levite – the Jewish religious professionals of that day (Luke 10:25–37).

The nature of Jewish-Samaritan relations (or lack of them) helps us to realize what a statement it was that Jesus chose to pass directly through Samaria instead of crossing the Jordan to avoid the area on the way to Jerusalem (John 4:4-5).  When Jesus spoke with a Samaritan woman outside one of their cities, it was directly contrary to Jewish custom (John 4:9), and when he agreed to eat with the Samaritans of the area – and even stay with them overnight – it was the ultimate outrage from the perspective of the Jews: Jesus accepted the Samaritans as being no different from the Jews themselves.

When Jesus healed ten lepers from the border of Samaria (Luke 17:11-16) – at least one of whom was a Samaritan (vs. 16) – he showed he loved the Samaritans just as much as anyone else.  In his teaching and serving alike Jesus accepted and cared for the Samaritans in a manner that completely negated their “untouchable” status in the eyes of many.

So, despite widespread Jewish antipathy, it is not surprising that the early Church recognized Samaritans as equal to Jews. Many Christians spread through the area of Samaria (Acts 8:1), and the evangelist Philip taught there (Acts 5:3-8).  Significantly, the leading apostles Peter and John were sent on a special mission to the area in order to confirm those Samaritans who had been baptized by Philip (Acts 8:14-17) – to show that their acceptance was the official position of the Church.
  
The ready acceptance of Christianity by many Samaritans is likely due to their expectation of a Taheb or “Restorer,”  a messiah-like figure whom they understood would be the prophet like Moses foretold in the Scriptures (Deuteronomy 18:15, 18).  The Taheb, they thought, would be so much like God that anyone who believed in him would believe in the Taheb’s Lord (God himself).

In his ministry, Jesus had taught that the time was coming when worship in the temples of both Jerusalem and Samaria would no longer be important (John 4:21), and the conversion of Samaritans was one of the first steps in the realization of that truth. The acceptance of Christianity by many Samaritans became a clear intermediate step between the preaching of the Gospel to the Jews and to the Gentiles – just as Christ had predicted (Acts 2).

Even today a few ethnic Samaritans still survive in their homeland – mainly in the city of Nablus in northern Israel – and have maintained their traditional identity and worship. Some Samaritan Christians also maintain their faith – descendants of the second oldest Christian community in the world, and the only group of believers founded outside of Judea by Jesus himself. 

To Flee or Not to Flee?

To Flee or Not to Flee?

Picture

We reprint this updated 2015 post from our sister site to mark the November observance of the International Days of Prayer for the Persecuted Church, honored variously on November 6, 13, and 20th.

​“The prudent see danger and take refuge, but the simple keep going and pay the penalty” (Proverbs 27:12).

I recently read a disturbing article in a Christian publication that stated that those undergoing persecution in areas where they and their families were no longer safe should not attempt to flee, but that they should have faith and should stay where they are in order to be a light to those around them, including their persecutors.

Although I’m sure the writer was well meaning, I think it is important that persecuted Christians understand  there is nothing biblically wrong with fleeing to protect oneself and one’s family rather than staying in the proverbial “frying pan.”  In fact, Christ specifically commanded his disciples to do exactly that: “When you are persecuted in one place, flee to another (Matthew 10:23, emphasis added).

Whenever it has been possible, it is “fleeing,” not “frying,” that has characterized Christianity throughout its history. We have only to look at the biblical record to see the example of countless men and women of God who fled persecution.  Moses fled Egypt before later returning (Exodus 2:15).  Elijah fled from Jezebel before it was his time to return (1 Kings 19:3).  Jeremiah urged the people of Jerusalem to flee before the city was attacked by enemies (Jeremiah 6:1).  The family of Christ was commanded to flee with the infant Jesus (Matthew 2:13), and Jesus, of course, told his followers not that they should not flee, but that they should pray that their flight be not at a dangerous and inopportune time (Matthew 24:20). It is historically clear that when Jerusalem was destroyed by the Romans in AD 70, with a great loss of Jewish life, few if any Christians died in the siege of the city, as they had followed the teaching of their master – and fled.

We see this pattern of fleeing persecution in the New Testament itself.  The Book of Acts shows that when Stephen, the first Christian martyr, was killed: “On that day a great persecution broke out against the church in Jerusalem, and all except the apostles were scattered throughout Judea and Samaria” (Acts 8:1).  The result of this fleeing was not some kind of spiritual decline of the Church, rather: “Those who had been scattered preached the word wherever they went” (vs. 4), and Christianity both spread and increased as a result.

Even the leaders of the early Church who stayed originally in Jerusalem thought it wise to flee when circumstances indicated they should. We see that the apostle Peter fled when his life was threatened (Acts 12:17), and the apostle Paul fled on numerous occasions to avoid persecution and threats to his life (Acts 14:6, etc.). 

So the Bible does not teach that we should feel it is a matter of faith not to flee when every indication is that it would be wise to do so.  Certainly, there are cases where God has called individuals to stay and face persecution, but without a clear call to do so, God expects us to use wisdom in all things (Ecclesiastes 7:12) and to avoid threats that are avoidable (Proverbs 22:3 and Proverbs 27:12).

The answer to most life-threatening persecution is not to stay, but to have the kind of faith that trusts God enough to flee and receive his guidance and help to reach a place of safety. The Church has always fled when appropriate and always will (Revelation 12:6). To suggest otherwise is to not understand the example of the Bible itself. 

For those of us who enjoy peace and safety, we should remember our persecuted brothers and sisters in prayer and consider the many opportunities to help them with food, clothing and other support.