“Behold, the virgin shall conceive and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel” (Isaiah 7:14).
There have been endless arguments between Christians and non-Christians through history as to whether the Hebrew word betulah in this verse – translated “virgin” in most English Bibles – should actually be translated “virgin” or just “young woman.” Non-believers have also argued that the son promised by Isaiah was simply the Jewish king Hezekiah. Conservative Christians feel there is ample evidence to show that the translation “virgin” is correct, and that the meaning of Immanuel – “God with us” – as well as the context of the promise could hardly be applied to Hezekiah.
But in this blog post we will go beyond those questions to focus on what the verse says and to look at its wider setting in the book of Isaiah. When we read Isaiah’s prophecy of the Immanuel to come, we may focus on the virgin birth of the child or the meaning of his name – but that is only half of the significance of this great verse. The incredible promise of “God with us” made in Isaiah 7:14 is coupled, if we think about it, with the equally astounding prediction of Immanuel’s humanity. God could have dwelt with humanity in the form of some kind of spirit being – to teach his ways – but the words “the virgin shall conceive and bear a son” show the humanity of the Immanuel as much as his name shows his divinity.
This duality of the fully human and fully divine Immanuel is stated again a few chapters later when Isaiah takes up the theme of the promised child once more:
“For to us a child is born, to us a son is given; and the government shall be upon his shoulder, and his name shall be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace” (Isaiah 9:6).
The promised One’s humanity is seen in “for to us a child is born” with the emphasis on his human birth contrasted with “to us a son is given” signifying a non-human origin that is made clear in the titles that follow. Interestingly, the four titles are equally indicative of the human and divine with “Wonderful Counselor” and “Prince of Peace” being essentially human titles and “Mighty God” and “Everlasting Father” being obviously titles that could only apply to God.
So, beyond its prediction of the virgin birth, the Immanuel promise of Isaiah stresses both the humanity and divinity of the One who was to come – a fact stressed equally in New Testament scriptures such as the opening verses of the Gospel of John:
“In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God … And the Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Son from the Father, full of grace and truth” (John 1:1, 14).
The statements that “the Word was God” and “the Word became flesh” are equally important in showing the Immanuel promise was fulfilled in the person of Jesus Christ. Luke’s Gospel confirms the duality in the same way:
“He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. The Lord God will give him the throne of his father David, and he will reign over Jacob’s descendants forever; his kingdom will never end” (Luke 1:32–33). Once again, the words “Son of the Most High” and “his father David” proclaim the unique and unmistakable roles of the Immanuel – the promised one who would be born divine and human, equally God and man, and who would eternally bring the two together.
Among the band of heroes that the Bible tells us were King David’s leading warriors – his “special forces operatives” – one warrior is particularly interesting. David’s chief fighters were all noted for great exploits, but one who stands out even in that crowd is Benaiah the son of Jehoiada. We might well call this warrior “Benaiah the lion hearted,” considering what is said about him:
“Benaiah son of Jehoiada, a valiant fighter from Kabzeel, performed great exploits. He struck down Moab’s two mightiest warriors. He also went down into a pit on a snowy day and killed a lion. And he struck down an Egyptian who was five cubits tall. Although the Egyptian had a spear like a weaver’s rod in his hand, Benaiah went against him with a staff. He snatched the spear from the Egyptian’s hand and killed him with his own spear. Such were the exploits of Benaiah son of Jehoiada; he too was as famous as the three mighty warriors. He was held in greater honor than any of the Thirty, but he was not included among the Three. And David put him in charge of his bodyguard” (1 Chronicles 11:22-25).
Take a minute to consider these exploits. The son of a famous warrior, Benaiah ended up excelling his father’s deeds. Living in a time when ancient Israel was frequently attacked by surrounding nations, he is first said to have killed the two greatest warriors of Israel’s arch-enemy Moab. We don’t know if he fought these enemies separately or together, but the Hebrew term used of them seems to imply that they were “lion-like.” Yet that is only the beginning of Benaiah’s reputation.
We are also told that Benaiah slew a giant Egyptian warrior who was doubtless part of an invading Egyptian force. This man is said to have been of great height – approximately the same as the famous giant Goliath that David himself had killed – but it seems that Benaiah was armed only with a stick or staff and that either through cunning or sheer strength snatched the Egyptian’s huge spear and killed him with his own weapon.
But the most notable of Benaiah’s feats is that he “went down into a pit on a snowy day and killed a lion.” This is the deed we need to think about in order to truly appreciate its magnitude. We are not told why Benaiah slew this fierce animal, but at that time lions frequently preyed on flocks and herds (1 Samuel 17:36), and this predator may well have been endangering the people of the area where the incident took place.
Whatever the reason Benaiah ended up fighting this lion, the story gives us some important details about the contest. Military ground operations must always take three major factors into account: the strength of the enemy, the terrain – including options for mobility and withdrawal, and the ambient conditions (fog, smoke, bad weather, etc.). If any one of these factors is disadvantageous, military units must operate with great care. In Benaiah’s case, all three of these factors were against him. The simple statement “a lion in a pit on a snowy day” indicates an enemy of vastly superior strength, in very difficult terrain, and with very negative ambient conditions.
These combined conditions meant that on the snowy day visibility may have been limited by flying snow. Being in a pit meant that the sun would not melt ice on the ground making it easy to slip, plus the fact that the wind would likely have blown more snow into the pit where in could have become quite deep – making it hard to move. These are all very difficult conditions in which to find oneself: in a pit, facing a lion with no easy way of retreat. Keep in mind that a fully grown lion can smash a human skull with a swipe of one of its paws and can bite completely though a human body. The lion may have been trapped in the pit, but once Benaiah entered it, so was he. Any person with a tactical background knows that the simple biblical description of this contest indicates what a huge victory it was for Benaiah.
Even with these great exploits, Benaiah was not one of David’s three top generals at this time. However, he is said to have been greater than the king’s top 30 fighters and, perhaps not surprisingly, to have been made the commander of the king’s bodyguard. But there is one final detail that is often overlooked regarding the hero Benaiah. First Chronicles 27:5 tells us that “… Benaiah [was the] son of Jehoiada the priest. He was chief and there were 24,000 men in his division.” Both Benaiah and his warrior father were Levites and his father is actually said to have served as a priest.
Perhaps we might not expect an individual with this priestly background to have taken on the enemies he did – including lion-like warriors and an actual lion, but the story of Benaiah, like that of David and Goliath, is one of several accounts given in the Old Testament that show the connection between faith and fearlessness – of active, tactical involvement in life and the willingness to take on real problems and enemies. In that sense, Benaiah is the story of a religious man who was not afraid to fight to help others. Thankfully, in our own day we do not have to fight lions, but the battles of faith are out there for the warriors who are willing to fight them.
We are all time travelers to some extent. Most of us spend at least part of our lives reliving the past or thinking about the future. This is not necessarily wrong – we were given memories to remember the lessons of the past, and imaginations to see and plan for the future as well as we can. But we were never intended to live in another dimension of time.
Sadly, some Christians who have undergone traumatic experiences, or who have made mistakes they find hard to forget, spend a lot of time and emotional energy dwelling on the past – re-living or analyzing events and mistakes and often suffering through the events repeatedly. This is definitely something that we need to overcome. We should always try to learn what we can from the past mistakes that we or others have made, but as Christians we are instructed to let these things be covered by the forgiveness we have in Jesus Christ (Hebrews 10:14–18). Isaiah specifically tells us “I am he who blots out your transgressions for my own sake, and I will not remember your sins” (Isaiah 43:25 ESV – and the clear implication is that what God chooses to forget, we should also.
Anything less is not to trust in the fullness of Christ’s sacrifice – it is to proudly believe that the sins and problems of our past are too great to be covered. We may not consciously think this, but if we do spend a lot of time re-living past events we should carefully assess our thoughts and ask God for help we may need to come back from the past: to forget the details, remember the lessons, and let God move us forward. As the apostle Paul (who was as conscious as any of us of mistakes in his past) wrote: “one thing I do: Forgetting what is behind and straining toward what is ahead” (Philippians 3:13).
It is much healthier – both emotionally and spiritually – to look forward rather than backward. But Christians may also fall into a ditch on that side of the road of life. If we find ourselves frequently being concerned about the future, we must focus on the fact that trusting God regarding our future is a basic aspect of our faith (Matthew 6: 31–33). As Jesus said: “do not worry about tomorrow, for tomorrow will worry about itself” (Matthew 6:34).
But there is a final and equally debilitating aspect of living in the future. Many Christians begin to look to the future as an answer to the problems of the present. This is not wrong if it is part of our trust that God will work things out, but if we begin to focus unduly on the coming kingdom of God or “when I get to heaven” or prophecies regarding the end of the world and what might happen next, we can begin to live in the future and lose our focus on living God’s will and doing God’s work today. Sadly, many who do this inadvertently diminish God’s calling in their lives. We can and should pray daily for God’s kingdom to come, but that involves the institution of God’s will now just as much as in the future. The responsibilities God gives us in this regard are all in the here and now. God calls us not to live in the future to escape the now, but to live in a now that is inspired by the future.
God himself is clearly a God of the present. When Moses asked God what his name was, God told him: “I am that I am” (Exodus 3:14) – God does not focus on what he has been or will be, his identity is tied to now, to eternally filling the present. Certainly God is the alpha and omega (Revelation 1:8; 21:6) – the beginning and the end – but that means he was and will be the same in an eternal present. And that is what God calls us to be, also. Trite as it may sound, there is a lot of wisdom in the old saying “Today is God’s gift, and that’s why we call it the present.”
When we focus on living in the present-moment, whatever we do – even the simplest action – can be fulfilling God’s long-term purpose for us. The psalmist wrote “I will sing praises to your name forever as I fulfill my vows each day” (Psalm 61:8), and this is God’s intent for us – for us to keep the big picture of eternity in mind, but to live in the present of each day we are given.
We should always remember that God calls us to let the past be our teacher, to let the future be our hope, but to let the present be our life.
When we see the words humility and service together, it is easy to think immediately of the humility of Jesus in serving humanity (Mark 10:45) and of the humility his followers are called to show in serving others (Galatians 5:13). But there is another side to the relationship between humility and service in that it often takes humility to be served.
When the New Testament tells us that “the Son of Man did not come to be served, but to serve” (Mark 10:45), it does not mean that Jesus was never served. We know he attended meals in the homes of others where he was served by the hosts (Luke 10:40–42; etc.), we have the story of the woman who washed his feet with her tears and wiped them with her hair in an extreme act of service (Luke 7:36-50), and Mark’s Gospel specifically tells us that a number of individuals “followed Jesus and cared for his needs” (Mark 15:41). In the same way, the apostle Paul – who served countless people throughout his ministry – referred to the deaconess Phoebe as someone who “has been helpful to many, and especially to me” (Romans 16:1-2 NLT).
But it is easy to forget – or never to really learn – that just as it takes humility to serve others, it can also take humility to be served. For a number of reasons, the human mind often resists being served and helped. A clear biblical example of this is found in the story we all know of Peter’s interaction with Jesus at the Last Supper:
Jesus … poured water into a basin and began to wash his disciples’ feet, drying them with the towel that was wrapped around him. He came to Simon Peter, who said to him, “Lord, are you going to wash my feet?” Jesus replied, “You do not realize now what I am doing, but later you will understand.” “No,” said Peter, “you shall never wash my feet.” Jesus answered, “Unless I wash you, you have no part with me.” “Then, Lord,” Simon Peter replied, “not just my feet but my hands and my head as well!” (John 13:3–9).
Here, we see that Peter initially declined being served by his Teacher, and in so doing almost rejected one of the greatest lessons his Teacher could ever give him, as well as the simple act of service that Jesus offered him. Like Peter, although our initial reaction to being served might be negative, we need to humbly and gladly realize that we should accept service being offered for our good. And we need to be willing to do this in many areas of life. Consider just a few examples:
We need humility to be served in sickness, injury, and in other situations where we cannot help ourselves. The apostle James tells us the sick should call for the help of elders who would anoint and pray for them (James 5:14–15).
We need humility to be served when people offer us personal advice, suggestions, or guidance. The example of Moses accepting the advice of his father-in-law regarding a matter in which Moses had far more experience (Exodus 18:13–24) is a clear one that we should understand in the context of Moses’ great humility (Numbers 12:3).
We need humility to allow ourselves to be served by God who came to serve and who works to save us. We should never be like the people of Jesus’ hometown of Nazareth who did not accept him in their pride (Luke 5:22) and, as a result, were not helped as they could have been (Mark 6:5).
The truth is, in our relationships with other people, there is a balance between serving and being served, supporting the needs of others and being supported in our own needs (Luke 4:38–39). We should always remember that we are called not only to serve others, but sometimes to be served also.
“Do everything without complaining” (Philippians 2:14)
Is it wrong for Christians to complain? Of course, the apostle Paul’s injunction in Philippians 2:14 is clear and is a principle we should follow. But at the same time, does this mean we should never complain? This is a good example of how we should not take a single verse out of the context of the whole Bible.
The Old Testament gives numerous examples of those whose critical and complaining spirit was condemned by God. For example: “Now the people complained about their hardships in the hearing of the Lord, and when he heard them his anger was aroused. Then fire from the Lord burned among them and consumed some of the outskirts of the camp” (Numbers 11:1–2). Passages like this show very clearly that God is not pleased with those who complain about real or imagined problems.
But the Old Testament also shows the other side of this situation. It gives examples of righteous individuals who complained and were not condemned. Moses (Exodus 5:22–23; etc.), Jonah (Jonah 4:1–3), and Jeremiah (Jeremiah 12:1) – among others – all complained to God and are not said to have done wrong. In fact, in each case, God patiently dealt with the complaining individual and carefully explained why things were the way they were.
The difference between these examples of acceptable complaining and those situations where complaints were condemned is clear to see. In every case where the Bible shows complaining was condemned, it was of complaints shared with other people. In every case where the complaint was acceptable to God, it was made directly to him.
Perhaps the best example of this acceptable complaining is found in the Old Testament prophets. Consider first the book of Habakkuk – which contains complaints the prophet took directly to God. First, Habakkuk asks God the age-less question “Why do you allow bad things to happen to good people?” (Habakkuk 1:1–4; 13). He follows that up with another complaint that is related yet different: “Why do you allow good things to happen to bad people” (Habakkuk 1:13–17). Interestingly, the prophet does not bring these complaints because he feels God is unloving, but because he sees the unfathomable injustice in the world (Habakkuk 1:4), and that is the basis of both his complaints.
In a similar way, the prophet Jeremiah wrote “Righteous are you, O LORD, when I complain to you; yet I would plead my case before you. Why does the way of the wicked prosper? Why do all who are treacherous thrive?” (Jeremiah 12:1).
Notice that Habakkuk and Jeremiah both took their complaints directly to God and in a respectful and humble way. But they (and other prophets like them) did complain to God – and God answered them. For example, by the end of the book of Habakkuk the author shows that he was satisfied with what God revealed to him, and could now find happiness despite his complaints and the problems he perceived in the world around him:
“Though the fig tree does not bud and there are no grapes on the vines, though the olive crop fails and the fields produce no food, though there are no sheep in the pen and no cattle in the stalls, yet I will rejoice in the LORD, I will be joyful in God my Savior” (Habakkuk 3:17–18).
Studying the book of Habakkuk and some of the other Old Testament prophets when we are suffering or when we simply cannot fathom the injustices of the world can help us rise above these things, but the greatest lesson we can learn from these servants of God in this regard is that we should not complain to others about the things God allows – which weakens our witness and which can be a form of judging God himself. Yet we can honestly take our concerns to God and complain as much as we want – asking him to help us see his wisdom in allowing what he does, and for help to trust him with the outcome.
So go ahead and complain if you need to – just be sure to take your complaints to the right place.
Recent Comments